![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:53:16 GMT, "Neil Gould"
wrote in : Recently, Larry Dighera posted: Bush administration propaganda? Could it be? [...] From what I've read/heard of the FAA's push for NextGen ATC technology, it would seem that they are using every propaganda tactic they can think of to permit aircraft manufacturers and air carriers to hijack the US ATC system (and imposing user fees and privatization) under the guise of addressing the delays. See if you don't agree: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/trans...ays_08-07.html (audio and video are available) I would agree that one general Republican agenda item is to get government out of "business activities", and in some cases this may be a Good Thing. It would seem to me, that the Bush administration wants to create lucrative businesses for private corporations by privatizing inherently government functions. What sort of government privatization would you characterize as a Good Thing? However, I read this article as clueless adherence to a bad plan. I read/heard it as delivering the heavily airline influenced party line despite its absurdity. The hub system is the issue because it overloads a few airports and backs up the rest of the system (one point mentioned in the article, btw). The air carriers' dogged adherence to the hub-and-spoke system may have been mentioned, but it was not emphasized nor addressed. In short, hubs don't work, The work to a point. Once the hub airports are saturated, that system results in delays. and the proposed solutions attack the wrong issues as though they are the problem. Exactly. It is that propaganda that I find so revealing of the airline industry's political influence on the Bush administration. It should be no surprise that such "solutions" are brought to us by the same idiots that brought us the "troop surge" in Iraq, yet another example of attacking the wrong issue while having no impact on the real problems. It's pretty clear that the Bush administration has an agenda to enrich Halliburton and the Carlyle Group stock holders and insiders through non-competitive bid contracts. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pilot claims no blame in July crash | Mortimer Schnerd, RN | Piloting | 48 | March 15th 06 09:00 PM |
FAA shares blame also | SolarSapien | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | May 26th 05 02:30 AM |
Blame the Vicitms: JAPANESE BBQ ON PAY-PER-VIEW TOMORROW ~ | BUFDRVR | Military Aviation | 0 | April 26th 04 01:44 AM |
Aircrews `to blame' for most crashes | Dave Kearton | Military Aviation | 12 | July 26th 03 05:36 PM |
O'Hare Controllers Raise Alarm, Blame Small Planes | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | July 10th 03 03:56 AM |