If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft
Charles Vincent wrote:
cavelamb himself wrote: Don't be snotty, Charles. Since the subject is an electrically powered aircraft, the weight issue is not trivial. That's been my issue with this thread from the start. The constraints given here were to fly at the same speed and altitude but at a higher weright. You can increase lift via increased angle of attack only as far as CLmax. No Farther. (You seem to have that part right) Beyond that any increased weight will require increased wing area. Aspect ratio alone won't answer is most cases. And - an electric powered plane would NOT lose weight in flight. No electrons are "consumed" - no change in battery weight. Not really being snotty at all. Frankly, I was in the process of deleting screenfulls of messages on the topic of electric powered airplanes being as the subject really holds no interest for me. For some reason I happened to read "The advantage from the electric engine at cruise is that it uses zero energy" on one message just as I deleted it. Pulling it back from the trash, I felt compelled to respond to it. My mistake. For some reason you are in turn compelled to nit pick my correct assertion because it did not completely cover the relevant aerodynamic theory. In my opinion, it covered enough, but not following the thread, I have no idea what sort of debate has been raging. As I stated elsewhere, I just didn't expect that information required for even the most basic pilot ticket would be the subject of any debate here. In the end, to fly at the same speed and altitude but at a higher weight requires more power be applied, whether you use that power to drag the same wing at a higher angle of attack or a bigger wing doesn't change that. Or you could use more power to drag the wing at a higher speed to generate the lift you needed. All of this ignores the fact that for internal combustion aircraft powerplants, the weight per HP goes down as the power goes up. Last time I looked at it, the opposite is true of electric motors. I don't think an electric assist for an IC engine is going to be viable for aircraft in the near future. Charles I guess I was just over reacting to the swing wing parasol comment. And yes, I can see your point. Higher Cl - or bigger wing. Either will require more power. Which was my point as well. Yep. A lot of this thread has been - well - fanciful? Richard |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electrically Powered Ultralight Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 178 | December 31st 07 08:53 PM |
Solar powered aircraft. Was: Can Aircraft Be Far Behind? | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 4 | February 9th 07 01:11 PM |
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 2 | September 22nd 06 01:50 AM |
Powered gliders = powered aircraft for 91.205 | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 2 | December 12th 04 03:28 AM |
Help! 2motors propelled ultralight aircraft | [email protected] | Home Built | 3 | July 9th 03 01:02 AM |