![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it has something to do with how the picture is compiled. See:
http://www.flyingmag.com/article.asp...age_numb er=1 Since the radar sweeps take time (20 seconds for each 360 deg sweep) and multiple are needed (14) to get a full vertical picture, it takes about 5 minutes for a complete volume scan. Being a "system" involving many possible points of failure (not necessarily catastrophic, sometimes just hiccups) a delay of 17 minutes seems to be entirely possible albeit uncommon. The good thing is that it's kind enough to show its age ![]() Marco "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... http://tinyurl.com/2mz2y9 Upper right corner. Note the age of the NEXRAD vs. the age of the XM lightning. -- Dan T-182T at BFM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
old NEXRAD | Dan Luke[_2_] | Piloting | 10 | August 27th 07 03:38 PM |
sferics vs Nexrad | Jose | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | August 18th 06 03:33 AM |
Shot at/Shot back | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 33 | March 11th 04 07:53 PM |