A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Wright Stuff and The Wright Experience



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #16  
Old September 29th 03, 02:20 AM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"robert arndt" wrote in message
om...

Big deal. Historic replicas of the '01 Gustav-Weisskopf/Whitehead GW
No.21 have flown in both the '80s and '90s- the latter by a Luftwaffe
pilot.


Not true. No historic replica of the '01 Gustav-Weisskopf/Whitehead GW
No.21 has ever been built or flown.



The Wrights dismissed the aircraft as having flown first due to
its design... which they claimed "could never fly". The original
flight and the two replicas proved them wrong.


There's no reliable evidence that there was an "original flight", the
lookalike aircraft prove only that an aircraft that looks like Whitehead's
can fly. They say absolutely nothing about Whitehead's work.



The fact that the NASM
continues to present the Wrights flight at Kitty Hawk as where it all
began is BS.


Not.



It began with the GW No.21 in Connecticut in 1901.


There's no reliable evidence that Whitehead's aircraft flew.



If only the scientific reporter of that flight had used a camera
instead of a sketch of that flight aviation history would be very
different.


There was no scientific reporter of that "flight".



But of course Weisskopf was a German immigrant and not
intent on pioneering aviation; rather, he was fixated on engine
development which failed in the US. Returning to Germany after never
achieving US citizenship, Weisskof died... and was soon forgotten by
everyone except for those in Germany.
His name deserves to be up there with Lilienthal and Zeppelin.


Lilienthal and Zeppelin made contributions to the science of flight,
Whitehead did not.



But America will never see it no matter what the evidence.


No evidence.



Even if his
exact motors were duplicated today and a perfect replica flew the
Wright myth will continue on just like the Yeager myth of breaking
Mach 1 first.


Even if his exact motors were duplicated today and a perfect replica flew,
it would not prove that Whitehead flew.



When it comes to "official" history vs real history I'd settle for the
latter.


Your messages about Whitehead indicate you have little interest in real
history.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.