![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote...
The pilot flying keeps his feet on the rudder pedals when hand-flying the aircraft. An unsafe practice, for modern airliners. Why does Boeing and the FAA advocate such an "unsafe practice," then? You need to know how to fly the airplane when it is broke. I think simulator time would be a much better place to play "hand fly the airplane" than during revenue. Well, as usual, your thinking is misguided, at best. Hand flying an airplane is a skill that cannot be learned and kept current via a simulator session every 6 or 12 months. No, use of the rudder is explicity unsafe. It's Ex-Lax time! You're so full of crap, it's taken over your brain! Use of rudder is absolutely required for crosswind takeoffs and landings, else the airplane will run off the side of the runway. Seldom will an airplane track absolutely straight down the centerline even with no wind or a direct headwind -- on crowned runways especially! Sure, but then you need to leave the rudder alone. There are exceptions to using the rudder, but in the general case, a modern airliner breaks when the operator panics while using the rudder. (ie A-300 USAir 427) In the general case, the operator does not panic while using the rudder. Your citation is an exception to the general case even if your assessment of panic were accurate in the situation. BTW, I have checked the 747-400 FHB, and turn coordination is indeed a function of the yaw damper. I had overlooked that detail, since the spoilers tend to assist in that same function. OTOH, the rest of your generalizations regarding [non]use of the rudders are still BS. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|