![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Umm, they didn't "pull out" of NATO. They very conveniently stayed in
just enough to whine about stuff but far enough out to never actually do any work. Actually, they did pull out of NATO. By March 1966, deGaulle had withdrawn France from NATO and its command structure because he felt that France needed to be independent of joint security considerations, which would not have been possible had they remained in NATO. As an example, they would have been unable to bar the presence of missiles from their soil that were under foreign (to them) control, which was a step that de Gaulle actually took. They remained out of NATO until Mitterand brought them back in during the early '90s, although I am not sure of that date or time period. George Z. As I remember they pulled out at least partly due to the Cuban missile crisis. It became apparent to them, and everyone else, that Europe could not depend on the US not to sell them out in a crisis. As happened. The US were willing to do a secret deal with the Soviets to pull out the missiles from Turkey in exchange for the Soviets pulling their missiles out of Cuba. The US would not be willing to commit to full scale war for Europe. The French felt that they needed an independent nuclear capability to deter the Soviets, rather than relying on the US, who had demonstrated a willingness to sacrifice NATO security for their own. Not that I blame the US. The whole massive retaliation thing wasn't a really practical proposition. In may sound good in theory, but when things come to a crunch, the US really couldn't be expected to make the supreme sacrifice for Europe. The Europeans knew this and were always wary of US efforts to distance themselves, or to restrict nuclear war just to Europe. I guess if the French nuked Moscow, the Soviets wouldn't have worried who they nuked in retaliation. Share the pain. As for the Transall, my 1968 Observors says crew of 4, 81 troops or 62 casualty stretchers and 4 medical attendants. Other (vehicle) loads not exceeding 35,270 lb. weight.Military Transports and Training Aircraft of the World add cross section of the cabin is 9ft, 7in by 10 ft 2 1/2 in for a length of 42 ft. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 09:10 PM |
Tecumseh Engine Mounting Question | jlauer | Home Built | 7 | November 16th 03 01:51 AM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |