![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Shirl" wrote in message ... "Matt Barrow" : This was in Chandler, where one cop (Lovelace) managed to get one innocent bystander killed during a high speed pursuit, then killed a lady for an illegal prescription. Chandler PD is both corrupt and grossly inept (according to my BIL who lives net door in Gilbert/Power Ranch (whose PD is even worse).- Hide quoted text Jay Beckman wrote: So you don't live in Chandler, AZ and neither, in fact, does your BIL yet you both are qualified to make this judgement, how? Does being a resident of a city qualify someone to make those kinds of accusations? I'd like to know what police dept *doesn't* have incidents where things turned out badly and could have been handled more efficiently. And how many incidents are handled well, solved, and have a positive outcome that don't make the nightly news and are taken for granted by residents? Always amazes me how an entire operation can be labeled as "corrupt and grossly inept" by a couple of splashy nightly news clips of unfortunate incidents. Even police will have a few successes :~) Look at their record, though, over the long term. Look, too, at their upper divisions and the city administration as well. Just as the public schools intent is not to educate (in the classical use of the word), neither is the purpose of the police, any more, to keep the peace. (Notice how in the 1970's an onward, police stopped referring to themselves as "Peace Officers" and started calling themselves "Law Enforcement". That requires a pretty big stretch of logic to infer that the laws are for protecting the public rather than some other group. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|