A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bonanza crash caught on video



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old September 2nd 07, 04:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Roger (K8RI)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 727
Default Bonanza crash caught on video

On Sat, 01 Sep 2007 05:42:52 -0700, Jay Honeck
wrote:

Many if not most Bonanzas don't use flaps even for short field and
this didn't look short. As some one from there mentioned it's 4000
feet at 1200 MSL. There is no take off maneuver even short field at
high altitude in mine that calls for any use of the flaps.


That's interesting -- I never realized that Bo pilots didn't need to
use flaps for departure.

I presume there is something about the wing that makes them
unnecessary?


"I think" meaning I don't know for sure, that flaps slow the
acceleration enough that nothing is gained in distance by using them.
That and with gear and flaps it has some very abrupt and demanding
stall characteristics.

Although the Bo is a "relatively" large single, it has roughly the
same wing loading as a Cherokee, or about 17# per sq ft (give or take
a tad). It's big, but it has a big wing with lots of lift and is a
very good short field plane for both landing and take off. The Debs
and earlier F33s had a shorter landing distance than some 172s. With
the larger engines they can also get out of a fairly short field.

One interesting characteristic of a soft field take off is if the up
elevator pressure is not eased off as the nose gear comes off the
plane will rotate into ground effect early and then settle back down
to never lift off again unless back pressure is eased off considerably
to allow the place to accelerate.

On asphalt you can get the plane into ground effect in a very short
distance. Then it becomes a balancing act to accelerate just inches
off the pavement while not touching back down. I'd be a bit hesitant
to try this technique on a real soft or rough field unless it were the
only way out.

I once had the privilege to experience a departure in ground effect
along with a tail wind in the Deb from Goodland KS. The ends of the
one runway are well above the center portion with rising terrain off
the end so you need to accelerate before the half way point. Just as
we reached the low point, the wind switched abruptly by 90 degrees
from a quartering head wind to a quartering tail wind. Too fast to
stop and to slow to fly. I hauled it off in ground effect and hoped
for the best. Fortunately there were no trees off the end of the
runway, but there were a number of large rocks/boulders. We were in
ground effect until cresting the hill. That was one tense departure.

Roger
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oshkosh P-51 crash video Frank from Deeetroit Aviation Photos 0 July 30th 07 06:06 PM
S-3 Crash Video Sanderson Naval Aviation 0 June 13th 05 10:22 PM
Orlando Crash Video Jay Honeck Piloting 35 January 21st 05 03:30 AM
VIDEO: Helicopter crash Micbloo Rotorcraft 0 November 3rd 04 03:28 AM
Video of crash 206 gaylon9 Rotorcraft 9 December 2nd 03 04:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.