![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "WaltBJ" wrote in message om... Cub Driver wrote in message . .. I have seen references to the circle's SNIP: In the Western Desert in WW2 Hans Marseille solved the Lufberry Circle problem by high angle deflection shooting at minimum range - knocking down serial kills of Hurricanes and P40s daily. The 'circlers' were essentially helpless against this tactic when used by an opponent of superior energy capability. Note that with more or less equal aircraft (and more aircraft available to join the fight) the Circle isn't that successful. It's also a way to get 'anchored' over enemy territory - when the fuel level rate of drop becomes an item of interest. The Circle worked well against conventional curve of pursuit attacks aince an attacker necessarily flew in front of the preceding defender, unless attacker had a much higher rate of knots so he could get in and get out before said second defender could get guns on him. Nowadays missiles defeat the defensive circle. Walt BJ Right on! Lufberry's looked good on paper....that is until the circle was engaged by fighters with lower wing loadings; and flown by pilots who knew how to bleed down and arc. Snap shooters like Marseille could play dixie on these circles...and did just that...against poorly flown Lufberry's. In fact, even a higher wing loaded fighter could engage through low yo yo's and arcing if flown by superior pilots. This was the "real" learning period in ACM. It involved the painful transition from thinking defensive to thinking like a Hans Marseille......attack! Just like Hartmann, he boresighted for conversion range using the windshield bow for wingspan instead of using the sight, then he pulled g for lead; raised the nose in the turn for gravity drop; centered the ball for trajectory shift, and hosed them at high angle off before he bled down and out of the cone. Pilots who were thinking about things like Lufberry's as they entered the war didn't last very long in combat. Nothing kills a fighter pilot faster than over thinking the defensive side of the ACM equation. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/CFI Retired For personal e-mail, use dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt (replacezwithe) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are aircraft cost-effective for defensive purposes? | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 6 | September 12th 03 01:23 AM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |