A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Defensive circle



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old October 1st 03, 04:50 PM
Dudley Henriques
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:17:33 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
wrote:


"Ed Rasimus" wrote in message
.. .



From another perspective, however, I had always learned that a
Lufberry was a 1-v-1 situation in which the attacker and defender were
trapped in a single circle, same plane fight, tail-chasing each other
and simultaneously trying to attack and defend against the other guy.
If transitioned from horizontal to vertical, it became a rolling
scissors.


Modern tactics and missiles have long ago
outdistanced any advantage in a Lufberry per se', and as for being

defensive
to the point of initiating a rolling scissors against a smart
shooter.........that's a heart attack on a bun for sure!!!
:-))))


When we used to instruct the scissors, either as a classic reversing
scissors or the rolling scissors, I used to tell the students that it
was the last place they ever wanted to be since more than 50% of the
people who enter a scissors die there.

They would look quizzically and then suggest it wasn't possible, as
one would be the victor and one the lose, hence 50%.

I then would point out the high likelihood of a mid-air between the
two frantically reversing aircraft, each trying to reacquire nose-tail
separation. Yep, more than 50%!


You are so right about losing sight. One of the greatest misunderstandings
among novices about aerial combat, and something they learn very quickly as
they move into the learning curve, is the value of sight. Many come in
visualizing only the written material, which as you and I well know, doesn't
begin to paint the "real picture" of what it's like up there when you start
yanking the damn thing around. They all seem to have that rock solid line
drawing view of what to expect. Then, all of a sudden, reality sets in as
they go nose to nose with a closure of 1000 kts or more. In fact, I don't
know about you, but one of the earliest "lessons" I had to deal with
personally when aggressively maneuvering a fighter was that my damn helmet
would slip down and block my vision in direct proportion to the g I was
putting on the airplane. Hell, I began to "really" learn something when I
realized that I could almost tell the g I had on the bird at any moment by
where the upper lip of the helmet was on my forehead!! :-)))
I also remember that one of the first things you encounter as an acm
instructor is getting them through that first hour of 1 v 1 with some kind
of feeling of self accomplishment, as all their preconceived "book learn'in"
and "notions" go right out the canopy and they start screaming through the
ICS...."How much offset did you say I need"......."Where is he????.......
Where the hell IS HE?????" "DAMN!!!! THERE he is!!!!........"
:-)))))
Dudley


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are aircraft cost-effective for defensive purposes? Chad Irby Military Aviation 6 September 12th 03 01:23 AM
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? Bob Gardner Instrument Flight Rules 5 September 6th 03 01:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.