![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message ... On Wed, 01 Oct 2003 14:17:33 GMT, "Dudley Henriques" wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote in message .. . From another perspective, however, I had always learned that a Lufberry was a 1-v-1 situation in which the attacker and defender were trapped in a single circle, same plane fight, tail-chasing each other and simultaneously trying to attack and defend against the other guy. If transitioned from horizontal to vertical, it became a rolling scissors. Modern tactics and missiles have long ago outdistanced any advantage in a Lufberry per se', and as for being defensive to the point of initiating a rolling scissors against a smart shooter.........that's a heart attack on a bun for sure!!! :-)))) When we used to instruct the scissors, either as a classic reversing scissors or the rolling scissors, I used to tell the students that it was the last place they ever wanted to be since more than 50% of the people who enter a scissors die there. They would look quizzically and then suggest it wasn't possible, as one would be the victor and one the lose, hence 50%. I then would point out the high likelihood of a mid-air between the two frantically reversing aircraft, each trying to reacquire nose-tail separation. Yep, more than 50%! You are so right about losing sight. One of the greatest misunderstandings among novices about aerial combat, and something they learn very quickly as they move into the learning curve, is the value of sight. Many come in visualizing only the written material, which as you and I well know, doesn't begin to paint the "real picture" of what it's like up there when you start yanking the damn thing around. They all seem to have that rock solid line drawing view of what to expect. Then, all of a sudden, reality sets in as they go nose to nose with a closure of 1000 kts or more. In fact, I don't know about you, but one of the earliest "lessons" I had to deal with personally when aggressively maneuvering a fighter was that my damn helmet would slip down and block my vision in direct proportion to the g I was putting on the airplane. Hell, I began to "really" learn something when I realized that I could almost tell the g I had on the bird at any moment by where the upper lip of the helmet was on my forehead!! :-))) I also remember that one of the first things you encounter as an acm instructor is getting them through that first hour of 1 v 1 with some kind of feeling of self accomplishment, as all their preconceived "book learn'in" and "notions" go right out the canopy and they start screaming through the ICS...."How much offset did you say I need"......."Where is he????....... Where the hell IS HE?????" "DAMN!!!! THERE he is!!!!........" :-))))) Dudley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are aircraft cost-effective for defensive purposes? | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 6 | September 12th 03 01:23 AM |
NACO charts - why have a reference circle? | Bob Gardner | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | September 6th 03 01:15 PM |