![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5 Sep, 10:37, Tom Gardner wrote:
On Sep 5, 8:03 am, Ian wrote: On 5 Sep, 01:31, Dan G wrote: You do not attach a cable to the glider until it is ready to fly. All checks complete, nothing left to do. Yes, precisely. I don't see any problems with that. I'll go further and state that I would need to be convinced that anything else was safer. Agreed - as long as the ground crew (signaller, driver, anyone else involved at the site in question) are also ready to go. Which is fine in an ideal world. But it doesn't always work like that. Sometimes there are delays, and a safe system will take account of that possibility. Er, what's the problem with releasing the cable if there's a delay? In what way isn't that a "safe system"? How long a delay? Ten seconds? Twenty? A minute? What if the ground is muddy and the pilot doesn;t want to make someone grovel in the mud again to reattach? What if an impatient instructor (I have seen this) is saying "Don't drop the cable, this won't take long". Yes, in an ideal world we could hook up and go. I just think the final word on whether to start the launch should rest with the pilot in charge ... and in a world where occasional delays between hook-up and launch are inevitable, that means the pilot should initiate the launch after the hook-up. My reasons for liking the "Up slack" and "All out" signals from the pilot are because too many signallers are rotten at deciding when to do the transition (although most are fine). I have in the past pulled off because the signaller was giving "All out" too soon, and I'll do it again if I have to ... It's when people start thinking that the rules will keep them safe that accidents happen. True, but of course that has only tangential relevance to whether or not the rules are good. I don't agree. No rules which are followed mindlessly are good. Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another fatal accident | Mike the Strike | Soaring | 0 | September 20th 06 11:50 PM |
Fatal accident in Italy | 2cernauta2 | Soaring | 1 | April 4th 06 05:50 PM |
Fatal accident near Wenatchee, WA | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | June 27th 05 01:54 AM |
Pilot's 2nd Fatal Accident | Aardvark | Piloting | 44 | May 21st 04 02:34 PM |
Hawaii Fatal Accident | Rocky | Rotorcraft | 0 | July 25th 03 03:01 PM |