![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Newps" wrote in message . .. Matt Barrow wrote: Kinda hard to have a wet top end in a Continental 520/550, isn't it? uh, no. Okay...so I'm misunderstanding a wet top end. Still, you inferred the accusation that Newps was faking his compression levels, so put up or shut up. I'm assuming a wet top end is an engine tested that just got done flying. My engine was cold, the mechanic towed it over to his side of the T hangar building that morning so all cylinders were 60 degrees F I "assume" a wet top end is done for a radial where the oil has flowed to every part of the engine (NOTE: I'm woeful on mechanic-speak). IAC, my take, FWIW, is a certain jealousy that your engine, after a few hundred hours, was reading better than these other folks engines do when damn near new. That an engine can run LOP without blowing up, and running many hundreds of hours that way, and still have good compression and oil analysis is likely disheartening to many who have to abide by the "Old Fashioned" way of things, particularly the folks who wouldn't DARE contravene the established ways of old. That infidels like you and me and many others have had good results is, well...distasteful to them! :~) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|