![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message ups.com... In order to appeal to the next generation, this is what I think we need: - a small turbine engine suitable for GA aircraft with fewer moving parts and smoother operation - gas mileage comparable to an SUV - a fully composite airframe - molded aesthetic interiors - cost about 2-3x the price of a luxury car Rotary engine - Poor boys turbine. Greatly reduce the moving part count, for weight, cost and reliability, and keep some of the fuel efficiency. Noise - The need for wearing a headset has to go. Vibration - Hard for me to understand with today's technology, why we are still flying aircraft with reciprocating engines, hard coupled to flywheels (propellers). Every other vehicle I can think of provides some kind of dampening between the engine and final drive. Would make a tremendous deference in creature comforts, if not reliability as well. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|