![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 23:12:55 -0000, Jim Logajan
wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: On Thu, 13 Sep 2007 06:44:17 -0700, RL Anderson wrote in : Here's a link to one of the most stupid ideas coming out of the Department Of Homeland Security: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news/196127-1.html Are you able to cite specific changes this proposal would require that are not already required? To paraphrase what you wrote in response to someone else on another thread: Perhaps you might consider actually reading the news article and follow the link it provides to the proposed rule change instead of admitting your laziness and ignorance publicly in a worldwide forum. Your paraphrase is inaccurate. I didn't assert an admitted uninformed opinion as the author of the article I followed up did. I requested more information. You are capable of discerning the difference, aren't you. Anyway, since you insist on asking a question that you could have answered yourself had you bothered to read the article, Your presumption is inaccurate. I read it. I didn't see anything new of significance, so I requested more information about what would change. I haven't made any international flights recently, but as I recall it was necessary to provide most of the information this NPRM mandates when dealing with inbound and outbound Customs agents anyway. I'll try to summarize for you by quoting some of what the DHS says will now be required that was not required before. Thank you. Quoted material before the ellipsis summarizes existing requirements, material after ellipsis summarizes new requirements: "The advance notice of arrival requires information about the number of alien passengers and number of U.S. citizen passengers, but it does not require any identifying information for individual passengers onboard to be submitted. The current regulations do not provide a specific timeframe when the notice of arrival shall be given, but direct that the pilot shall furnish such information far enough in advance to allow inspecting officers to reach the place of first landing of the aircraft. ... Under this rule, CBP is proposing regulatory changes that include requiring the advance electronic information of notice of arrival combined with passenger manifest data for those aboard private aircraft that arrive in and depart from the United States. Additionally, this rule proposes amendments regarding notice of arrival requirements, landing rights, and departure requirements." I don't see anything particularly burdensome there, but of course, we are lacking specifics about notice of arrival requirements, landing rights, and departure requirements. Presumably most airports of entry have the means to convey electronic roster submissions. The one hour advance notice seems reasonable to me, as Customs delays can often exceed that. What am I missing? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ ihuvpe | Chris | Instrument Flight Rules | 43 | December 19th 04 09:40 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |
Live ATC - A victim of homeland security?? | Sam | Piloting | 28 | May 26th 04 03:45 PM |
Office of Homeland Security suggestion | Tom Ridge | Military Aviation | 1 | April 1st 04 10:22 PM |
"Homeland Security" in Iowa | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 52 | January 2nd 04 12:57 PM |