![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Viperdoc" wrote in message ... Eclipse will survive only if they can deliver 500-600 planes a year, and if they do not encounter engine or avionics issues along the way (as they already have). Their current production is less than around 20-30 a month, not enough to keep the cash flow going for very long. Well, they have 2000 on order, so 500-600 a year isn't going to be to tough once they get going. Read their whitepaper on their production methods. There is also no way an Eclipse will cost $415 an hour, even if flown hundreds of hours a year. Fuel alone will cost $300 an hour, At full power, it's 90gph; at cruise it's 55 to 60. That 90gph is when it climbs to FL350 in 21 minutes. and insurance for 2 million is around $25,000 a year. Insurance is 32,000K divided by an estimated 500 hrs a year = $64/hr. At 200 hours a year this already Not too many jets fly 200 hours a year - more like 500, or more for air taxi/charter. adds up to over $500/hr. Figure any regular maintenance and engine reserves, hangar, etc, and it'll be at least $750 an hour. Maint and reserves come under their "Jet Complete" program which is $150/hr and covers scheduled and unscheduled maintenace, flight support, recurrent training, a fuel program that discounts fuel 40 cents a gallon, AOG over night, nav and WX database updates, rental engine coverage, etc. As for engine TBO reserve, it's going to be far less than a TP engine (with prop OH)or a Williams FJ-44 or 33. They are also range and payload limited, particularly compared to turboprops. Their NBAA ranges is 1125 nm, for a King Air C90 it's 831. They are small and tight inside, especially compared to a King Air. They have more leg room (18") than a King Air C90 (7.5"), are 1.2 inches narrower, and 4" shorter (47" vs 51") They fly 100 kts faster, and climb nearly twice as fast, s your trip time is less. Their market may be smaller than they originally proposed, and with lots of competition. Unless they ramp up significantly and start rolling a lot of planes out the door soon, they will run out of cash unless they get a ton more venture capital. Having Bill Gates, whathisface Allen, and several other high rollers is a pretty good influx of capital. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What am I gonna get if I ask for a pre-purchase inspection? | mhorowit | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 06 05:06 PM |
What gonna be to Boeing X-32A/B CDAs? | Gregory Omelchenko | Military Aviation | 0 | May 10th 04 01:53 AM |