A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What's it gonna take?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #39  
Old September 14th 07, 02:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Matt Barrow[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,119
Default What's it gonna take?


"Viperdoc" wrote in message
...
Eclipse will survive only if they can deliver 500-600 planes a year, and
if they do not encounter engine or avionics issues along the way (as they
already have). Their current production is less than around 20-30 a month,
not enough to keep the cash flow going for very long.


Well, they have 2000 on order, so 500-600 a year isn't going to be to tough
once they get going.

Read their whitepaper on their production methods.


There is also no way an Eclipse will cost $415 an hour, even if flown
hundreds of hours a year. Fuel alone will cost $300 an hour,


At full power, it's 90gph; at cruise it's 55 to 60. That 90gph is when it
climbs to FL350 in 21 minutes.

and insurance for 2 million is around $25,000 a year.


Insurance is 32,000K divided by an estimated 500 hrs a year = $64/hr.

At 200 hours a year this already


Not too many jets fly 200 hours a year - more like 500, or more for air
taxi/charter.

adds up to over $500/hr. Figure any regular maintenance and engine
reserves, hangar, etc, and it'll be at least $750 an hour.


Maint and reserves come under their "Jet Complete" program which is $150/hr
and covers scheduled and unscheduled maintenace, flight support, recurrent
training, a fuel program that discounts fuel 40 cents a gallon, AOG over
night, nav and WX database updates, rental engine coverage, etc.

As for engine TBO reserve, it's going to be far less than a TP engine (with
prop OH)or a Williams FJ-44 or 33.


They are also range and payload limited, particularly compared to
turboprops.


Their NBAA ranges is 1125 nm, for a King Air C90 it's 831.

They are small and tight inside, especially compared to a King Air.


They have more leg room (18") than a King Air C90 (7.5"), are 1.2 inches
narrower, and 4" shorter (47" vs 51") They fly 100 kts faster, and climb
nearly twice as fast, s your trip time is less.

Their market may be smaller than they originally proposed, and with lots
of competition. Unless they ramp up significantly and start rolling a lot
of planes out the door soon, they will run out of cash unless they get a
ton more venture capital.


Having Bill Gates, whathisface Allen, and several other high rollers is a
pretty good influx of capital.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What am I gonna get if I ask for a pre-purchase inspection? mhorowit Home Built 1 February 27th 06 05:06 PM
What gonna be to Boeing X-32A/B CDAs? Gregory Omelchenko Military Aviation 0 May 10th 04 01:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.