![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 09/24/07 20:14, Dennis Johnson wrote: "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... The EFC is of use only if you experience communication failure. Assuming that's the case, then with no EFC, you're expected to proceed upon reaching the holding fix as though the EFC was zero. Thanks for the correct answer. In the meantime, I also found the answer in AIM 91.185(c)(3)(ii): "...leave the clearance limit at the expect further clearance time if one has been received, or if one has not been received, ... as close as possible to the ETA..." Yes, and that is the answer you want to give on the exams, but in real life, you'll find that the controllers want you out of the air as soon as possible. They're expecting you to get on the ground asap. I wouldn't plan on waiting for your ETA once you get to the fix... If you really lose comm, waiting until your ETA is the correct procedure. Matt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bose X - $995 and holding... | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | November 30th 05 12:57 AM |
Holding pattern reporting | Yossarian | Instrument Flight Rules | 14 | July 4th 05 10:57 AM |
Stupid Newbie Pattern Question | Lakeview Bill | Piloting | 76 | June 11th 05 02:54 PM |
Holding at CHS | Stuart King | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 10th 03 07:52 PM |
Holding Pattern Entries | Dan Luke | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | July 11th 03 05:18 AM |