A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mechanical Vario



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old September 30th 07, 12:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default Simplicity (WAS - Mechanical Vario)


"Dan G" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Sep 28, 11:44 pm, Bob Whelan
wrote:
Personally, I think the Gospel of Simplicity ought to be preached more,
because so much of soaring does not REQUIRE the latest in bells and
whistles be present in order for fledglings to begin spreading their
wings in personally gratifying and safe ways. Flight (in any form)
costs more than remaining groundbound. Soaring flight as a niche
certainly isn't cheap (in time or money or mental effort required), and
any barriers (real or imagined) to achieving it are precisely that:
barriers. I don't think soaring participants should be promoting Mark
CXXIV widgets as a universal good, or worse, as necessary, to everyone
getting into the sport.


Couldn't agree more - hence my comment that technology peaked with the
B40 :-).

I'm not a big fan of slavishly following the vario when cruising -
there's a lot of evidence that there's little to be gained in terms of
overall XC speed. In fact there's a very good chance that by the time
you've slowed up, you're in sink, and by the time you've accelerated,
you're in lift. A glider doing 70 knots is travelling at ~30 m/s -
allow for the seconds of the vario reacting, the pilot reacting, and
the glider responding to your control inputs and you'll have travelled
an easy 100 m - that is, you're effectively reacting to air that's 100
m behind you. Which probably won't be doing the same thing as the air
you're now in.


This is a testable thesis.

Careful study of OLC logs show those with the best flights do indeed indulge
in 'dolphin flying'. Of course, not all zooms are successful, but on
average, they are. Successful 'dolphin flying' requires several things.
One, the thermals must be wide enough. Two, the glider must have good
penetration and three, the pilot must be using relatively high interthermal
airspeeds. (You can't zoom from a low airspeed.)

If you have SeeYou, set it up so there are four windows - three of equal
size on the right half of the screen stacked one above the other. On the
left half display the map view with the trace color set to vertical speed.
Set the top right window to a graph of true airspeed (IAS would be better
but it's not available). Set the middle right window to vertical speed and
set the bottom right window to altitude. Expand the time axis of the three
right windows to the maximum. Now, save this "desktop" so you don't have
set it up again - then animate the flight log.

Those pilots who are 'dolphin flying' will show a sharp reduction in speed
as lift is encountered and a jump of several hundred feet in altitude. If
the zoom is successful, the altitude trace will show a resumption of the
glide displaced upward from a estimated continuation of the pre thermal
encounter trace. In the statistical analysis, the zoomers will show D:h
ratios in the hundreds for their straight glides. Those pilot not zooming
in lift will show D:h values around their best L/D. Dolphin flying clearly
works, but you have to be good at it. The best pilots are really good at
it.


What's much more important in terms of XC speed is climbing fast - and
to do that you need an accurate, well set-up vario. Mechanicals suck
on that score, and as Mike says, they often take the fancy kit with
them unless they've been set up by an expert.


No arguement. The best climbers easily win the day. It's amazing to see
OLC traces on SeeYou where the vertical speed trace shows a sine wave
matching the circle time. This clearly shows the pilot is not centered in
the thermal. The best pilots will show an average climb rate 2-3 knots
better than the average pilot on the same day. The pilot who are good at
zooms are also good at selecting and centering thermals - often on the first
turn.


BTW, on the gust issue, there is another solution (though not nearly
as elegant as the rotating TE probe) - accelerometers. The Vega by
Triadis uses them for gust filtering, but I've not heard of any pilot
reports.

In secret laboratories around the world they are working on the dreaded
"Inertial Variometer" that will change everything.

Bill Daniels


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: CAI L-NAV readout meter and Sage or PZL mechanical vario. [email protected] Soaring 2 August 28th 07 03:18 AM
Placement of Mechanical Vario in Panel? V1 Soaring 3 July 29th 07 08:55 PM
Mechanical Vario or not? Fish Soaring 15 July 2nd 06 02:28 PM
Winter mechanical vario reading high Alan Meyer Soaring 13 April 13th 06 02:38 AM
Wanted: Used Mechanical Vario Tim Hanke Soaring 0 May 16th 05 05:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.