![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 2, 12:27 am, Jay Honeck wrote:
The average privately owned GA aircraft is flown AT MOST once a week. As a result, rust (from inactivity) is the #1 killer of the average, privately owned GA engine. Many don't make TBO because of inactivity. Touch & goes are the #1 worst thing you can do to your engine. Flight school planes do them all day long, but it's because they are flown daily, sometimes 8 hours per day, and they therefore NEVER experience the ravages of inactivity. Therefore, although it's STILL the worst thing you can do, the engines often make it to TBO simply because they are flown all day, every day. Are the engines designed to take this kind of abuse? Sure. But they were designed to be run daily, not weekly, too. And when you are paying something in the range of $20,000 for an overhaul (as we did for our O-540) we don't generally make a practice of stressing the engine any more than necessary. -- Interesting points you bring up here Jay. I've had similar conversations with the maintenance mgr at the flight school I taught at a few years back. As the consumate gearhead, I'm always picking up data points from mechanics & operators/pilots and attempting to separate real usable advice from the old wives' tales (and outright BS) which seem to be prevalent in aviation. Letting a plane sit idle is bad as it invites corrosion & seals drying out etc. Starting the engine and letting it run for a 10 minutes (thinking you're helping by circulating oil) and shutting it down is even worse, as all that does is introduce more moisture into the engine. You can't get an engine up to operating temp without flying it, which will evaporate moisture in the crankcase. Flying is the only way to properly excercise all the plane's systems IMHO. Touch & go landings are probably harder on an engine than cruise flight because of the short cycle heat/cool effect from full power/low airspeed flight followed by reduced/idle power (repeat ad nauseum) I think this is much less an issue in a low HP engine like the 160/180HP O-320/O-360 or even the 200hp IO-360. I'd never do T&G with a high HP plane like a Saratoga/C210/Bonanza because those engines generate more heat (I'm told) because of their higher power output, and air cooled engines can only dissipate so much heat effectively. I have talked to one pilot who did T&G landings somewhat regularly in a Turbo Bonanza, which made me cringe. I doubt that engine made it to TBO with its original cylinders. For those planes, full stop & taxi back landings are preferred. They also eliminate the possibility of grabbing the gear handle instead of the flaps when cleaning up the plane on the go. (seen this happen a few times with predictable results) After hearing all the stories and warnings about shock cooling, I've come to understand it's an issue mainly with turbo'd high HP engines (Duke, 421, P-Navajo) that operate in the flight levels where the cooling effect is not great. A "chop n drop" approach without careful CHT monitoring can cost big $$$ if cylinders cool too fast and warp. This just isn't a problem in a low HP, non-turbo'd aircraft IMO. It doesn't mean you can be ham-fisted when operating your engine, just that there's a bigger margin for error with a lower performance acft. BTW, did your 540 overhaul only cost $20k? That sounds like a steal! Will |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scared of mid-airs | Frode Berg | Piloting | 355 | August 20th 06 05:27 PM |
UBL wants a truce - he's scared of the CIA UAV | John Doe | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 19th 06 08:58 PM |
The kids are scared, was Saddam evacuated | D. Strang | Military Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 10:36 PM |
Scared and trigger-happy | John Galt | Military Aviation | 5 | January 31st 04 12:11 AM |