![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 3, 8:09 pm, The Amaurotean Capitalist
wrote: On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:06:23 -0700, Eunometic wrote: P-51; the P-38 had sufficient range to cover untill the P-47M with a wett wing which actually could excede the range of the P-51. The P-47N wasn't available until nearly a year and a half after the P-51B; good luck trying to sell a long-range P-47 available in mid-1945 to Arnold when he demanded a long-range escort fighter for the ETO in mid-1943. Gavin Bailey Yes but the P-47B or P-47C didn't have the tail tank and therefor range yet. If pressed to find a solution to extra tankage it would have been possible to introduce a tanked wing earlier i feel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Two essential items... | john smith | Piloting | 19 | December 26th 06 02:48 AM |
Delaware LLC Owned Aircraft California Based Aircraft | ChrisEllis | Piloting | 6 | January 17th 06 03:47 AM |
Commercial rating: complex aircraft required aircraft for practical test? | Marc J. Zeitlin | Piloting | 22 | November 24th 05 04:11 AM |
Exclusive Custom Home Plans, and Essential information about building your New Home | orange tree | Home Built | 4 | November 20th 05 04:37 PM |
Experience transitioning from C-172 to complex aircraft as potential first owned aircraft? | Jack Allison | Owning | 12 | June 14th 04 08:01 PM |