![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 14:36:55 -0700, "Gatt"
wrote: "Le Chaud Lapin" wrote in message ups.com... So yes, I believe this experiment illustrates an important phenomenon in aerodynamics. It is not the only phenomenon that plays a role, but it has one, nevertheless. The decriptions of lift that I read in flight books seem to ignore it. Subsequently, all the airplanes are falling from the sky. I recommend building an airplane sometime. The ultimate way to prove your theory is to be like the Wright Brothers; build it and fly it. Folks on this forum have logged hundreds of thousands if not millions of collective hours and all of them have put their asses on the line based on the aerodynamic principles in books, so you're not going to get much respect here if you want everybody to do experiments just to discuss to your otherwise-unproven theories. Some people here have built their own planes, or engineered airplanes, or maintained them so -their- science is sufficiently proven. All the discussions and textbooks and usenet theories in the world aren't worth your first solo flight around the pattern. That demonstrates that the aerospace engineers proved their wing design and that the pilots here proved their ability to manipulate that technology. That's what it takes. About once a month somebody comes in here and wants to talk about how aerospace science is all wrong but the thing is, none of 'em ever seems to have flown an airplane. If you don't do their math for them just the way they want you to, however, somehow it's all the pilots and plane builders out here who don't know what they're talking about. I think your theory would be great put into practice on an experimental aircraft. I promise you, if you fly it they will come. Best of luck to you. -c I will first admit I haven't done the experiments outlined in Lapin's posts. I will second admit that airplanes do fly. Thirdly I will admit there are many very good reference books on "why" airplanes fly. The key word here is "why". The fact that people can design and build a machine that flies, means they have mastered the elements of design that allow an aircraft to fly. It doesn't mean they know "why" it flies. There are accepted theories, disproved theories, questionable theories and unproven theories, but they are all theories. Le Chaud Lapin has posted some experiments that in their present form exhibit some interesting characteristics. Whether or not these characteristics can be extrapolated to winged aircraft remains to be seen. Certainly further, much more complex, testing would have to be done. However, that fact should not provoke the kind of vitriolic attacks I've seen in this forum. Just because someone posts something outside the box of conventional thinking is no reason to attack them. Ron Kelley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA advisory voids IFR certification for GPS's!!! | Prime | Owning | 12 | May 29th 07 01:43 AM |
Brass or copper sheet? | Scott | Home Built | 11 | October 15th 06 02:20 AM |
4130 sheet | log | Home Built | 4 | September 1st 04 01:42 AM |
Day 2 New Castle Score Sheet | Guy Byars | Soaring | 3 | September 25th 03 02:39 AM |
S-H Spars: Anyone check for voids laterally? | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 1 | September 20th 03 04:27 AM |