A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AFSS response time



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #26  
Old October 6th 07, 04:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
R. Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 25
Default AFSS response time

The weekend after they closed the FSS at IPT my local airport, I called to
file a VFR to HMZ. I spent twenty minutes on hold with a recording
repeatedly saying " please hold your call is important to us", I thought if
that was true they would be on the line by now. Anyway I gave up, went to
the plane and after firing up in front of the hanger I called on the radio
and filed. With the relay radio at IPT that worked great, then on return
did the same thing once high enough to call Altoona FSS (also closed) on the
radio.

I thought about it and later called and filed an official complaint. In a
few days I had a call from the Lockheed manager out at Nashville. Nice guy,
but only really said they are on a learning and training curve and they will
improve very shortly and he was sorry for the inconvenience.

On top of that it appears now you need to call one toll free number to file
and then a different number to close. That seems to be not only odd, but I
don't remember seeing that advertised prior. My be my CRS

Ron Gardner

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:56:48 GMT, "
wrote in
. net:

Has anyone else noticed that the time you're on hold to talk to a briefer
is
getting longer and longer? I noticed this about a year ago when I still
lived in Florida and thought it was just a local problem. Now I live in
Virginia and they have the same problem here. It used to be you could get
a
human on the phone in a minute or so. Now it is taking about 5 to 10.

Is this how the FAA is trying to kill the FSS system? They have made no
bones about wanting to reduce the coast of the FSS system.




LOCKHEED MARTIN: AFSS PERFORMANCE IS IMPROVING
(http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196306)
Right up front, we'll say we've heard the same complaints about
Lockheed Martin's handling of the Flight Service Station contract as
everyone else: Long wait times, dropped calls, lost flight plans and
briefers lacking local knowledge of the areas they cover. Lockheed
Martin's Dan Courain, the company's VP of aviation services, says he
has gotten a similar earful and at AOPA Expo on Thursday, Courain told
AVweb that LockMart is doing something about. Specifically, it has
rewired the call waiting system to delay bumping of calls from their
origination area to other parts of the system, where briefers may be
umfamiliar with local landmarks, airspace and conditions.
http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196306



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
FAA Application -- kinds of time Gary Drescher Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 23rd 04 02:33 PM
Stryker/C-130 Pics robert arndt Military Aviation 186 October 8th 03 09:18 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Retroactive correction of logbook errors Marty Ross Piloting 10 July 31st 03 06:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.