![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The weekend after they closed the FSS at IPT my local airport, I called to
file a VFR to HMZ. I spent twenty minutes on hold with a recording repeatedly saying " please hold your call is important to us", I thought if that was true they would be on the line by now. Anyway I gave up, went to the plane and after firing up in front of the hanger I called on the radio and filed. With the relay radio at IPT that worked great, then on return did the same thing once high enough to call Altoona FSS (also closed) on the radio. I thought about it and later called and filed an official complaint. In a few days I had a call from the Lockheed manager out at Nashville. Nice guy, but only really said they are on a learning and training curve and they will improve very shortly and he was sorry for the inconvenience. On top of that it appears now you need to call one toll free number to file and then a different number to close. That seems to be not only odd, but I don't remember seeing that advertised prior. My be my CRS ![]() Ron Gardner "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 22:56:48 GMT, " wrote in . net: Has anyone else noticed that the time you're on hold to talk to a briefer is getting longer and longer? I noticed this about a year ago when I still lived in Florida and thought it was just a local problem. Now I live in Virginia and they have the same problem here. It used to be you could get a human on the phone in a minute or so. Now it is taking about 5 to 10. Is this how the FAA is trying to kill the FSS system? They have made no bones about wanting to reduce the coast of the FSS system. LOCKHEED MARTIN: AFSS PERFORMANCE IS IMPROVING (http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196306) Right up front, we'll say we've heard the same complaints about Lockheed Martin's handling of the Flight Service Station contract as everyone else: Long wait times, dropped calls, lost flight plans and briefers lacking local knowledge of the areas they cover. Lockheed Martin's Dan Courain, the company's VP of aviation services, says he has gotten a similar earful and at AOPA Expo on Thursday, Courain told AVweb that LockMart is doing something about. Specifically, it has rewired the call waiting system to delay bumping of calls from their origination area to other parts of the system, where briefers may be umfamiliar with local landmarks, airspace and conditions. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#196306 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
FAA Application -- kinds of time | Gary Drescher | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 23rd 04 02:33 PM |
Stryker/C-130 Pics | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 186 | October 8th 03 09:18 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |