![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Rosenfeld wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:13:00 -0700, Bee wrote: They also claim that the TAA area minimum altitudes replace MSAs for these IAPs. That is incorrect. They make MSAs unnecessay but they do not replace them. MSAs are not IFR altitudes in this country. Although the TAA minimum altitude, and MSA have different definitions, I never had a problem with the concept of them being the same value when there is a TAA published. Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA) Well, I don't see how they can be the same value when the MSAs don't exist. MSAs provide 1,000 feet of obstacle clearance everywhere. TAAs provide 2,000 feet in DMAs. But, the greater concern is someone tortures the comparision to conclude that MSAs, where charted, must now be IFR altitudes. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|