![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:36:02 GMT, "HEMI-Powered" wrote:
Greg Farr added these comments in the current discussion du jour ... Attachment decoded: Great Egret landing 2.jpg ` Attachment decoded: XB-70.jpg I see your point, Greg, but the XB-70 is just a tad bigger! grin I remember looking at the one then outside of the Wright-Patterson AFB USAF Museum, circa 1986 or so. What a huge but beautiful bird! Not being a military aircraft guru at all, I never learned why the XB-70 was never developed or even tested beyond (I think) only 2 prototypes, but then, a lot of aircraft and other weapons never get developed or have a very short life. Hello, By the time she was ready to fly, her speed and altitude capabilities were insufficient to protect her from the, by then, improved Soviet surface-to-air missile capabilities. Additionally, the costs of production and operation were deemed excessive. Yes, only two were built, but the second crashed during testing, taking with her co-pilot Carl Cross and chase pilot Joe Walker. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why an Egret & an XB-70 are simular (0/1) | Greg Farr | Aviation Photos | 3 | October 22nd 07 10:55 AM |