![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc J. Zeitlin" wrote I think we can safely say that the rotation won't be any big deal. It's arguable whether or not a range of 0.56 G to 1.44 G would be any more objectionable than the G loading felt during turbulence. Since these types of turn rates would occur pretty infrequently, my guess would be that this would not be a big deal. These numbers might need a little massaging to get them to be more accurate, but they're certainly in the right ballpark. We're NOT talking about 2 G or negative G's here. Thanks for putting some real numbers to that. I needed the reality check, to sorta' prove what I suspected. The G's are nowhere near a show stopper, as you numbers show. If there was a problem, there could usually be extra care during the turns to turn more slowly, and not put extra G's on the passengers. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 28 | August 3rd 07 07:51 PM |
X-48B Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft Takes First Flight [1 attachment] | §qu@re Wheels[_4_] | Aviation Photos | 5 | July 30th 07 06:17 AM |
Design merit of blended wing aircraft | Rob Mohr | General Aviation | 0 | June 13th 04 02:45 PM |
Blended wing bodies and sailplanes...? | Robert Bates | Soaring | 8 | December 23rd 03 09:34 PM |
Hitting airliner with rifle round? [was: PK of Igla vs. airliner] | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | August 20th 03 11:29 PM |