![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bertie, I'm not too good at explaining this. It isn't the angle of
banking that matters but how fast you roll the airplane on its axis to to get to the back angle that matters. We've gone thru the arguement that one can rotate an airplane around its roll axis 360 degrees and not have someone on that axis feel anything but 1 G into the seat. This is different -- someone else ran the numbers to show what happens to the local G sense as a function of how fast the airplane accelerated into the roll -- we'd have called that alpha with two dots above it back in the long hand calculus days. Accelerate into the bank angle too quickly and if I was sitting far from the roll axis you'd lift the wine from my glass. You would, I promise, need a locked cockpit door if you did that. I'd be at whining over spilt wine. OK, put the stun gun away, or aim it over there at the other widebody and frequent poster here. On Oct 19, 2:58 pm, Bertie the Bunyip wrote: Tina wrote groups.com: Bertie, the issue isn't the degree of bank, but rather how fast you roll the airplane into the bank, that would make a px well off center feel the gs Dave mentioned. For example, if you had Mx sitting on a wing tip and you wanted to drop the wing out from under him, you'd bank into that wing quickly. If you banked slowly he'd not feel himself grow lighter, but if you did it sharply you near the center line wouldn't feel much but you could yank that tip down at better than 1 G even when going to a bank limit of 20 degrees. That was the issue Dave addressed. The question was, when you start to bank into a turn, how quickly do you establish the bank angle? I'm guessing you go from wings level to 20 degrees in a slow count of 3 or 4 -- not too much acceleration -- but would appreciate a guesstimate from some who does it for a living. Well, even in a conventional airplane you try to do it as smoothly as you can Actually, you try to do that in any kind of flying no matter how outwardly frantic it may appear! But I can't see it being significant to pax comfort unless they were out at the wingtips. In any case the aircraft would almost certainly be fly by wire anyway so the opportunities we'd have to raise your red wine out of your glass! Given a cabin width of fifty feet and a rate of rotation of, say, ten degrees a second, you'd be moving, you'd move about four or five feet in a second. You'd hardly feel it at all if the rate was introduced smoothly. In fact, you'd be closer to the CG than you would be if you sat in the nose or tail of any other modern jet whilst it was making a pitch change. Bertie |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Flies Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 28 | August 3rd 07 07:51 PM |
X-48B Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft Takes First Flight [1 attachment] | §qu@re Wheels[_4_] | Aviation Photos | 5 | July 30th 07 06:17 AM |
Design merit of blended wing aircraft | Rob Mohr | General Aviation | 0 | June 13th 04 02:45 PM |
Blended wing bodies and sailplanes...? | Robert Bates | Soaring | 8 | December 23rd 03 09:34 PM |
Hitting airliner with rifle round? [was: PK of Igla vs. airliner] | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | August 20th 03 11:29 PM |