![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
While they were waiting, I set him up in our newly upgraded Kiwi flight simulator (see it he http://www.alexisparkinn.com/flight_simulator.htm), at their home airport. I knew he would want me to program in some crosswind (to better simulate the landing at home) and while tinkering I ran across a choice I had never used befo "Download real-time winds and weather." I clicked on it, not knowing what to expect. Well, quicker than I can check ADDS weather, Flight Simulator X had gone on-line and downloaded the current weather at their home airport. It then incorporated this weather into the sim, and within moments our guest was getting tossed around in real-life turbulence, fighting a stiff, 80-degree cross wind to land -- at his very own airport -- EXACTLY like he was about to do in "real life". Very cool! I know there are those here who don't think sims are very useful, but this new (to me) feature really enhances the overall experience. And our pilot-guest certainly agreed! This option exists in FS 2004 as well. MSFS is surprisingly good at weather from version 2004 on. Vast improvements were made and the sky really does look realistic, and the weather really does match the correct and current weather at your sim location (if you choose to download real weather). However, if you want the absolute best in simulated weather, download and install ActiveSky (about $37, http://www.hifisim.com). This is the standard for MSFS weather for serious simmers and it is astonishingly realistic. It was designed by pilots and weather fanatics and goes into extraordinary detail. Many weather scenarios in the sim are pretty much indistinguishable from real life with ActiveSky running. Even more amazing, frame rates are the same or slightly better with ActiveSky, as compared to MSFS' own weather engine. I was walking home a few days ago and looked at the sky and thought "that looks as nice as ActiveSky," before I realized the absurdity of that thought. A few days ago I nearly ended a flight in tragedy when I got caught on the outer edge of some thunderstorm activity while trying to reach KJFK (I use ActiveSky now). I diverted to KEWR and survived, but not without injuring a FA in turbulence. I saw the anvil-shaped thunderheads from miles away, but I didn't make the connection and recognize the danger until I was nearly in it. And lately the winds along the Pacific coast have been quite hellish, too--great for challenging simulation but not something I'd want to fly in for real. You also get turbulence over the mountains, thermals to order, and wake turbulence, as well as severe icing if the circumstances warrant it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interfacing w/ real life instruments | [email protected] | Simulators | 1 | October 29th 07 11:45 PM |
A real life pilot's first sim experience | Tony | Piloting | 60 | March 31st 07 04:26 AM |
Real Life (in IMC) IFR training | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | November 29th 06 02:03 PM |
REAL NAVY LIFE | B.C. Mallam | Naval Aviation | 2 | February 10th 05 01:20 AM |
Real-life flight planning | Paul Folbrecht | Piloting | 34 | February 10th 04 06:08 PM |