![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 2:00 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote:
John Galloway wrote: as an ex Duo owner I agree with Dave Nadler and Bill Daniels; the Duo airbrakes are better than their reputation: Well, clearly, not all current and former Duo owners agree. My 2c: (Our club has a duo, so based on some experience.) The actual glide angle of the duo, with full spoilers out and at a stable approach speed, is decently steep. Looking at this angle at altitude is instructive. The duo seems not to lose speed as quickly as other gliders when you open the spoilers, especially in ground effect. "Too high" really often means "too fast". I think a lot of the perception that the duo has poor divebreakes is realy that it does not slow down fast, rather than the actual steady state glide angle is shallow. This all makes some aerodynamic sense. The duo is heavier than basic trainers, and much heavier than the single seaters we are used to. "Spoilers" work as much by "spoiling lift" as by "increasing drag", and much of the latter is induced drag due to the gap in the lift distribution anyway. John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
MA-8 with parachute extended S63-00693.jpg | [email protected] | Aviation Photos | 0 | April 10th 07 02:52 PM |
spoilers vs. ailerons | [email protected] | Piloting | 36 | August 8th 05 11:24 AM |
Frozen spoilers | stephanevdv | Soaring | 0 | November 4th 04 05:24 PM |
Extended GPX Schema | Paul Tomblin | Products | 0 | September 25th 04 02:44 AM |
L-13 Spoilers | Scott | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 03 06:08 AM |