![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Oct, 05:51, Marc Ramsey wrote:
wrote: Position and velocity vector is not sufficient information for a smart collision alert, What more information are you using besides position, pressure altitude, and GPS-derived velocity vector to calculate a trajectory prediction? If adequate information and processing power is available, than it should not matter in the least whether the prediction is made by the transmitter or receiver... If his system is using aircraft performance as well, then for the trajectory to be calculated by the receiver would either requi 1) aircraft type to be transmitted, and the receiver to have a database of all possible performance parameters or 2) performance parameters to be transmitted with the other data Both these have obvious (I think) disadvantages - it makes sense to me to have th etransmitting aircraft say where it thinks it's going. Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
General Janis Karpinski/Karen Kwiatkowski discuss war for Israel in Iraq and beyond... | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 23rd 06 11:44 AM |
FLARM | Robert Hart | Soaring | 50 | March 16th 06 11:20 PM |
Flarm | Mal | Soaring | 4 | October 19th 05 08:44 AM |
FLARM | John Galloway | Soaring | 9 | November 27th 04 07:16 AM |
Roadable aircraft group please join and discuss with us in our forum | Strafi | Home Built | 0 | October 22nd 03 01:37 AM |