![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 29, 6:09 pm, "Gatt" wrote:
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message news ![]() The line item veto was declared unconstitutional soon afterwards, Congress offered to re-authorized the money, but the Air Force declined because they wanted to spent the money on Predator and Global Hawk. And let's not forget that try as you might, you can't blame the first SR-71 retirement on Clinton. Why not? It was first deactivated in the '80s, before the Clinton administration. -c I think it's pretty likely they deactivated it because they had a replacement that was even better. They don't generally give up capabilities unless they can be replaced by something just as good or better. Why stick with 60s technology when you can bring it up 20 years and take advantage of newer technology? They just haven't decided to publicize it yet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|