![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Almost every week on this
group, we get another sad message informing yet another fatality. And most of the cases, pilots has been extremely experiensed. We know that they haven't done any stupid moves, they just lost the control of the plane on wrong situation or the plane has failed on them. This is unfortunately not a very accurate picture. The newsgroup tends to hear of the "extremely experienced" category, but the majority of the 4-6 fatalities per year in the US are fairly simple screwups around the home airport. The vast majority of the fatalities among the "extremely experienced" pilots also come down to fairly simple pilot errors -- trying to ridge soar some tiny bump in a strong wind, thermal up off the middle of the canyon, make that last desperate transition, flying over unlandable terrain because "there is sure to be a thermal there" and so forth. More experienced pilots take greater risks. Fatalities from "losing control" or "the plane has failed on them" are essentially unheard of. So here's the bottom line. Flying gliders is not inherently risky. We only fly in good weather, our systems are very simple, and there is no engine to fail. This rules out 90% of the causes of accidents in light planes. If our pilot training and rules of engagement were the same as that of the airlines, our fatality rate would be less then theirs. That's why numbers are misleading. It's not Russian roulette, with the question "how many chambers are loaded?'" A danger rate anywhere between extreme motocross and airline flying is entirely in your own hands. The accident-waiting-to-happen takes this fact and says "they were all pilot errors. A truly skilled pilot like me would never do something so stupid." This is a good defense mechanism, but a wiser pilot (or spouse!) will notice that the pilots who crashed felt the same way. The wiser pilot remembers the temptations to which his much more skilled and accomplished friends fell, and understands "where they failed I could fail as well." He studies obsessively, makes contingency plans and sets personal limits, and runs through his checklist once more. Why do we do it? In the end, there is nothing in the world like the sense of wonder and accomplishment at the end of a long cross-country soaring day. John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Those *dangerous* Korean War relics | Kingfish | Piloting | 192 | June 19th 06 07:06 PM |
Okay, so maybe flying *is* dangerous... | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 51 | August 31st 05 03:02 AM |
Dangerous Stuff | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 21 | July 16th 05 05:55 PM |
New news Soaring is dangerous ? | R Barry | Soaring | 29 | October 3rd 04 03:40 AM |
small airplanes are dangerous | JimTheBoatMan | Piloting | 31 | April 29th 04 10:44 PM |