![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, John Kulp posted:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:07:55 -0500, "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATsuddenlink.net wrote: John Kulp wrote: On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:34:47 -0600, Newps wrote: John, you seem to be under the impression that GPS is going to somehow manage to change the physics of time and space. Yes, when airlines use GPS they can fly direct from point A to point B but if A and B are crowded they are still going to have to wait on the ground to take off and fly around in circles waiting to land. Where did I say this? I said that if spacing can be reduced due to safer wake turbulence management then GPS can be used to safely close those spaces and improve the capacity of the system. That's all. Just where do you think I am confused. And, if I am wrong (or confused) From what you said on 10/29/07: "Gates can be a problem sometime but not runways. The GPS system would handle about 25% more flights on the same runways." And restated in your response to Jim: "So you are saying, at peak rush times, there is 25% extra time for separation to be maintained?" -- Jim in NC "GPS allows for closer spacing and straighter flight paths allowing more flights to be handled in the same time span. About 25% more." It appears that your expectations are too optimistic. The reasons for the required separation in the destination airspace are wake turbulence and runway safety. GPS will not have an impact on that, and that is where and why the delays are occurring. As several others have explained, getting there faster will not mean getting on (or off) the ground faster. It may be that having 25% more flights in the air would only aggravate the situation, as the required separation would still have to be maintained in the airport's environment. a. why is the FAA going ahead with the building of the system? b. why are the airlines backing that change? There are some benefits to upgrading the technology, particularly in regard to near-misses en route. But, as long as the airlines' scheduling and hub system are unchanged, there probably won't be any big improvement in the number of delays. Go to one of the busier airports and observe the arrivals and departures and you'll get an idea of why. Neil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel Supplements | Jetnw | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 15th 04 07:50 AM |