![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 14:44:07 -0700, Harry Andreas wrote:
In article , wrote: AESA, What's this? Active Array radar. Higher performance and more versatile than mechanicaly scanned planar arrays. More reliable too. At the moment Typhoon uses the CAPTOR radar, but this may well change to the AMSAR active array radar in future. There's also the possibility of a conformal smart skin array of sensors, firther increasing radar capability. 360 degree IRST, My understanding is Eurofighter has an IRST too. the 360 part is very important. Possibly. In any case, I imagine it wouldn't be difficult to add a reverse-looking one to Typhoon, perhaps on a wingtip pod. stealth, -9X, The AIM-9X will have a shorter range than the Meteor (I'm assuming that Singapore would buy it, it seems quite logical if they are going for an air superiority fighter). So the Typhoons would be able to get the first shot in (not only that, since they are faster than the F-35, they have the ability to decide at what range the engagement takes place). If the engagement does get to close range, the Typhoon has (according to figures I've seen) a better thrust to weight ratio and lower wing loading. F-35 has thrust vectoring, but late models of the Typhoon might too. Typhoon is dynamically unstable, which should increase its maneouvrability. You seem fixated on close range combat. I don't think so; I did specifically say that long range missiles would be used first, but there's a possibility of close range combat -- I've no idea how high that possibility is. Postulating a South Asia Typhoon v F-35 engagement, what makes you think the more stealthy F-35 won't use NCTR then shoot the Typhoon in the face BVR with an AIM-120? I don't know what NCTR is, so I won't discuss that. If the F-35 is switching its radar on to detect the Typhoon, then the Typhoon will presumably be able to detect this (the signal will be billions of times stronger at the Typhoon than what's received back at the F-35), so I am doubtful of the possibility of the F-35 sneaking up on the Typhoon undetected. -- "It's easier to find people online who openly support the KKK than people who openly support the RIAA" -- comment on Wikipedia (My real email address would be if you added 275 to it and reversed the last two letters). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 30th 04 06:20 PM |
B-17s Debut, RAF Wellingtons Bomb & Fighters Sweep at Zeno's Video Drive-In | zeno | Home Built | 0 | October 30th 04 06:19 PM |
Why don't all fighters have low Wing Loading? | Chad Irby | Military Aviation | 6 | September 22nd 03 10:52 PM |
US (Brit/Japanese/German/USSR) Use of Gun Cameras in Fighters?? | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 3 | July 17th 03 06:02 AM |
Scrambling fighters | John Doe | Military Aviation | 7 | July 2nd 03 09:26 PM |