![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karl Striedieck wrote:
Is the 20 meter DG-1000 authorized for acro? With 20m it's authorized for "basic" acro, which means Loops, Turns and erect Spins. No rolls and no negative g. With 18m it's authorized for full aerobatics. If it is I'm curious about the reason. Both ships were designed to meet JAR standards regarding strength and dive brake performance. Because the dive brakes are *not* of equal strenght. I've never compared side by side, but the DG1000 definitely allows for a much more sloppy approach. (Not that I would advocate sloppy flying!) I've read that you compared them and think both are the same, I definitely don't share your opinion. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fun with trailling edge dive brakes | Scott Elhardt | Soaring | 16 | May 9th 14 02:52 AM |
Polar with spoilers extended? | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 85 | October 29th 07 09:16 AM |
High on Final, Summary; was Polar with spoilers extended? | Steve Leonard | Soaring | 4 | October 27th 07 07:22 AM |
Extended GPX Schema | Paul Tomblin | Products | 0 | September 25th 04 02:44 AM |
L-13 Spoilers | Scott | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 03 06:08 AM |