![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote in message
ups.com: On Nov 1, 11:19 am, chris wrote: On the poll I was confused by the explanation of question 8[?] regarding using the last exit position of the start cylinder as the scored start point rather than the point closest to the first turnpoint. I understand the concept of the proposed rule change. The explanation seemed poorly written and confusing to me. The description said something about exiting out the back, then flying through the gaggles in the start cylinder. I don't understand this because if you did this then by definition you pass through the start cylinder again and then have a restart on the 2nd exit right? [start=last exit of start cylinder] Why did we not have a choice to change the scored exit point to anywhere on the front 1800 of the start cylinder? That seems like the best of both concepts with the fewest problems. Chris If the principle of giving a pilot his best score is applied, and speed achieved after exiting the back and then flying across the cylinder (on a street of through a "boomer") at a speed that exceeds the rest of the on course speed for the flight, a pilot can improve both his speed and his score. This is a significant safety concern and likely to happen. Where elso do you have lift so well marked as the prestart? Limiting to the "front " 180 solves this but has computation issues due to potentially significant variations in the heading of the first leg. Wanna take a swing at trying to write some language to deal with these considerations? This is a good example of something that seems very simple actually not being so simple. Thanks for you thoughts. UH Hank, I think it is simple. Here is my language: "Your start is scored for distance and time when and where you exit the start cylinder the last time" It sounds like your example would still have the pilot who exited at the back of the cylinder coming back through the cylinder again to use the pre-start gaggles, hence getting scored when (s)he exits the cylinder at the front with the rest of the gaggle. I think that if you get a valid start and distance calculated from the last exit of the start cylinder, wherever that may be, that seems to answer the questions of safety because there would be _no_ advantage to taking a boomer toward the back and bumping through the frontward start gaggles because then you would be back inside the cylinder and be scored when and where you subsequently exited the cylinder. Additionally, you would need to be sure that you were below the start cylinder height for 2 minutes to get a valid start. I would submit three examples where my approach would improve safety. 1) Because I will get credit for distance flown, not the minimum course line distance from the front of the cylinder, there is no advantage for me to be at or near course line (which is currently the _most_ advantageous place, and where most of us tend to congregate). I can now be 5 miles left or right of course line, away from the rest of the gaggles and know that I am in just as good a position as anyone else because I get scored for distance and time when I leave the cylinder on the side. 2) I see a 4 kt. boomer forming toward the back of the cylinder that I estimate can take me a 1000' above the top of the cylinder. I climb out of the top of the cylinder, 6 miles back, getting a start from that location when I exit the top. I take it up appropriately based on strength and head on course. The only thing I need to be aware of at this point is that I do not slip back down into the cylinder (which is where all the pre-start gaggles are milling around) so that my original start time is busted. And I will certainly be flying a bit slower in order to make sure that I do not penetrate the start cylinder again. 3) I see a good thermal toward the back of the cylinder. The contest has seen numerous leechers. I decide to slip out the back of the cylinder and go around the side and onto course. I have an incentive to travel toward the back of the cylinder now because I get credit for the distance from the last exit. This action puts me at least 5 miles to the left or right of course line hence spreading out the pack. This approach should be easy to score, easy to understand, and have the original desired effect of spreading the field out before the start. Larry Goddard 01 "zero one" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
79% More lenient landout scoring per 2006 US rules poll | chris | Soaring | 8 | December 11th 06 07:45 PM |
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 2 | October 6th 06 03:27 PM |
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
2005 SSA Contest Rules Poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 01:47 PM |