![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think it is simple. Here is my language: "Your start is scored for distance and time when and where you exit the start cylinder the last time" As Larry points out, the issue of separating pre-start and post-start traffic is fairly easy to solve. As one minor addition, if you do slip back in to the cylinder, you can then start again if you stay under for two minutes, or take your original start, but scored in the old- fashioned way. The scoring program already knows to look for multiple starts and take the best one. The scoring program already finds the "start fix" so the change is not hard to program. Previous discussions of this option at SRA meetings focused on a different issue, highlighted in the pro/con of the poll. In no wind the "start anywhere" option is great, it's like a start line because all parts of the start circle are equally good. But in significant wind, the optimal start point is at the upwind edge of the cylinder, rather than at the wind-triangle upwind point under current rules. If in addition, it's a crosswind or downwind, the optimal point is 90 degrees away from the courseline. Now, as currently, it's not a huge big deal to start 30 degrees away from this optimal point, but it is a bit worse than currently because you start and then make a sharp course change. Still, the US RC wisely decided not to use a start line, because in a significant crosswind it funnels all gliders to one point in space, the upwind edge of the start line. There is some concern that the "start anywhere" option would have this same effect. The most important question, I think, for the poll, is how do pilots feel about this? Are the obvious advantages of "start anywhere" on days without much wind offset by the potential disadvantage of this scenario? In your experience, how often is there enough cross or downwind on the first leg that this would be a problem? The RC is pretty good at thinking through traffic issues, but this really is a pilot preference issue, and hearing opinions on the poll will be very useful. John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
79% More lenient landout scoring per 2006 US rules poll | chris | Soaring | 8 | December 11th 06 07:45 PM |
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 0 | December 1st 06 01:36 AM |
SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 2 | October 6th 06 03:27 PM |
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 1 | September 27th 05 10:52 PM |
2005 SSA Contest Rules Poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 01:47 PM |