![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jerry Wass" wrote Maybe this will be the push that the gubermint needs to pass some kind of protection for individual parts makers, similar to what was done for small aircraft manufacturers some years back. Somewhere, somehow, I'm hopeful that the gubermint will do something to make it less attractive to let everyone going sue-happy. Crazy, yes. I still hope it happens, though. It NEEDS to happen, anyway. -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Commercial precision landings | [email protected] | Piloting | 19 | August 19th 06 09:51 PM |
Non-precision approach without a published MAP? | Peter R. | Instrument Flight Rules | 20 | August 1st 06 08:09 AM |
Why are non precision approaches not lined up? | Greg Farris | Instrument Flight Rules | 31 | October 9th 05 05:05 PM |
Precision instrument flying | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 9 | May 22nd 05 02:25 PM |
For Sale: Precision Simulator 1.2 | Mike | Simulators | 0 | November 15th 03 10:54 PM |