![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wolfgang Schwanke wrote:
wrote in : OK your're writing from a European perspective. You do realize most of our states are bigger than most of your countries? How does that make efficient rail services impossible? Also, cities here are a bit different too. In some ways yes, in others not so much. I don't dispute that a rail network has to be adapted to the local conditions. It is all "city" from Santa Monica to San Bernardino, for example, but they are about 60 miles apart. Europe has several "cities" of comparable sizes, for example Randstad, the Ruhr conurbation, and some of the large metropolis like Paris, London, Moscow come close. Both my wife and I commute over 50 miles one way. My next door neighbor commutes 60. So? But we can shift the weight a lot if we want to. Private cars can become mostly leisure toys. Not with 30 to 60 mile commutes being common for most places. Why not? Regards Because the US isn't a large number of people going to a small number of places, it is small numbers of people going to a huge number of places. There are no major hub sites. The highway system is a giant web with an enourmous number of branches and more than just freeways. As a matter of fact, both the wife and I could take public transportation to work. The only problem is the trip would be about 4 hours each way. To work, public transportation has to go everywhere the public wants to go, which means it has to stop a lot. And again, there are virtually zero hub points where you could go quickly. There is a reason the freeways have on/off ramps at about a mile apart. Los Angeles does have light rail along the few high traffic corridors where it makes some sort of sense. For most of California, and most of the country, such a system makes no sense. Just because something works in one place does not mean it will work in another. This is the problem with all the one-size-fits-all thinking by people that are going to solve all the worlds problems if only their pet scheme were implemented. Public transportation works in the New York area, many parts of the east coast, and in small areas of the west coast. It doesn't in the majority of the country other than local, urban buses. Heavy rail works to get bulk cargo between major hubs. It doesn't work to get all the stuff that needs to be transported everywhere. Solar power works pretty well in Arizona, not for crap in North Dakota. Tidal power generation doesn't work in Colorado, though it might in Alaska. The bottom line is if some system were economically practical, it would already exist or someone would be working on building it. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Myth: 1 G barrel rolls are impossible. | Jim Logajan | Piloting | 244 | June 22nd 07 04:33 AM |
barrel roll in 172 | Andrey Serbinenko | Piloting | 154 | August 20th 06 04:11 AM |
Bomb in a pickle barrel from 10,000 feet | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 15 | September 3rd 04 05:51 PM |
Barrel roll And g's Quest. | Robert11 | Aerobatics | 6 | July 16th 03 02:51 PM |
Barrel Roll And g's Quest. | Robert11 | General Aviation | 6 | July 12th 03 01:47 AM |