|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#13
November 21st 07, 03:41 PM
posted to rec.aviation.piloting
|
|||
|
|||
61.113 and expense reimbursements
In article ,
"Neil Gould" wrote: WHAT! If there are 4 the pro rata share of $100=$25. If there are 100 the pro rata share is $1. pro ra·ta (pro ra't?, rä'-, rat'?) adv. In proportion, according to a factor that can be calculated exactly. Your generalized application of the term "pro rata" does not account for the 50% requirement. For example, one could easily "calculate exactly" 20% of the cost of a flight, but if that is all a private pilot pays, then the FAA is likely to consider the other 80% paid compensation. where is this "50%" requirement? -- Bob Noel (goodness, please trim replies!!!) 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is expense of a new sailplane the reason? | Nolaminar | Soaring | 0 | January 7th 05 03:40 PM |
| expense analysis | Rosspilot | Owning | 12 | August 25th 03 03:34 AM |
Threaded Mode