![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-11-19 10:38:57 -0800, Ron Garret said:
I'm a private pilot. If I fly myself to a business meeting for a company that I work for and they reimburse me for the cost of the flight, have I violated FAR 61.113? rg Probably not if you are flying by yourself. Questionable if you are carrying passengers or property on behalf of the company. Contrary to what others have said, the FAA has been fairly consistent in their opinions. There is no reason a company cannot reimburse you for incidental personal transportation expenses. However, carrying passengers or property for hire must be as a commercial pilot. This is why companies hire commercial pilots to fly their corporate aircraft. So carrying passengers or property would probably be considered a violation. There are liability issues as well. If there were an accident and you were carrying these passengers and receiving more than your pro-rata reimbursement for them, then an insurance company or a tort lawyer would certainly argue that you were conducting a commercial operation. Finally, of course, there are Federal Income Tax questions. There may be some limits there for how much the company can reimburse you. -- Waddling Eagle World Famous Flight Instructor |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is expense of a new sailplane the reason? | Nolaminar | Soaring | 0 | January 7th 05 03:40 PM |
expense analysis | Rosspilot | Owning | 12 | August 25th 03 03:34 AM |