![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:45:46 -0700, Newps wrote:
WJRFlyBoy wrote: How so? By Fed do you mean Federal Court? Would not the FAA be liable to the charge that it is not doing everything possible to prevent such an accident by usurping an air directive? The jet was cleared for takeoff behind a Dash-8-200 "in violation of mandatory separation requirements." We don't even know if that's the case. If the jet took off from the same place as the Dash 8 then no wake turbulence delay was necessary. That's the point. There is no true case until there is legal deposition. Which is why I was asking Robert why he said: "It will be interesting to see if the fed's grant their request to sue the FAA." -- Remove numbers for gmail and for God's sake it ain't "gee" either! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Excel Flightlog | Sally W | Soaring | 2 | January 7th 07 11:53 PM |
New discussion forum for Sport Pilots and Light Sport Aircraft | [email protected] | Piloting | 6 | February 25th 06 06:51 PM |
New discussion forum for Sport Pilots and Light Sport Aircraft | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | February 9th 06 07:16 PM |
Light-Sport Aircraft / Sport Pilot group | gilan | Piloting | 0 | November 13th 05 04:53 PM |
Light-Sport Aircraft / Sport Pilot group | gilan | Owning | 0 | November 13th 05 04:53 PM |