Gene Whitt's Lawsuit

On Dec 8, 4:32 pm, wrote:
Ok, its not logical to me but if that is the way it is then that's
what it is! I can understand private airports not allowing anybody
to operate due to liability reasons but a public airport allowing
unknown strangers to operate freely if they are based elsewhere but at
the same time not allowing the same operations if they originate from
the same airport strikes me as a bit weird.





What this has to do with Mr Pai, is whatever the owners and/or operators
of the airport and the underwriters that insure the airport say it does
as they operate the airport under present law.
The legal definitions in place of what can take place on the airport,
originate from the airport, or take place on the airport in aircraft
arriving there from other locations all come under the above as it
covers these situations.
The fact that something doesn't make sense to you has nothing whatsoever
to do with the issue.

--
Dudley Henriques- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I think you are exactly right.
They are not consistant or reasonable.
If they are not illeagal then washington will be notified and the
rules will be changed.
I guess J. Inhofe can't get his BFR done at the Sand Spring William
Pogue Airport, it would be illeagal!
Good job, guys, defend YOUR rights.
Homer