![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I recall a teaching aid used to train WWII pilots. It was a simple table
top wind tunnel made of plexiglass with a "test section" about an inch wide and 6" high. It came with various aerodynamic shaped bits of plastic that could be used to visualize flow. There was a small exhaust fan to pull air through the tunnel and a clever "smoke rake" made with a small electrically heated pot and a rake made of small diameter brass tubes soldered together. It was a simple two dimensional wind tunnel. You put an ounce or so of kerosene in the pot and turned on the heat. After a bit, smoke started coming out of the dozen or so rake tubes. You then turned on the fan and neat parallel streams of smoke flowed around the shape in the test section. The reynolds number was all wrong but the visualization of air flow was way more than good enough to get the idea of angle of attack across. The airfoil shaped test bit was nearly perfect. At about 16 degrees of AOA, the smoke streams would burble and separate from the upper surface. No one left the demonstration unconvinced. The thing was a little messy. To see the smoke streamers clearly you needed to be in a dimly lit room which quickly filled with kerosene smoke. That's probably why it isn't used much anymore. Still, I'd love to have one. Maybe a computer program could be just as good. The thought occurs to me that those WWII flight schools went to a lot of trouble to teach AOA and the graduates were among the best pilots ever trained. Maybe we should take a look at that they did to train them. Bill Daniels "fred" wrote in message ... In my early hours of being instructed, not one went by without stall and spin practice. They also taught me to look out of the window. Maybe I've done a thousand or more turns before I found myself in a spin that I did not intend to happen. I was in an HP11, over a ridge, with a 1-26 out climbing me. "He can't do that!" With over 60 degrees bank, I just tightened my turn by pulling back on the stick. I increased my AoA without concern. Snap! The ridge was spinning below my nose and getting larger very fast. My old instincts kicked in. I was looking at the grass when I recovered. Now, AoA is my favorite subject to teach. My God! The ignorance is rampant. A tow pilot applied for a job. I asked him what the approximate angle of attack was for the Super Cub wing when it stalled. A commercial pilot raised his arm and pointed up about 40 degrees above the horizon. He went home. I was stunned. A favorite question I use for instruction... Which wing in a turn has the greatest angle of attack? The pilot has a 50-50 chance at the correct guess. No matter what his answer, I ask why? I get no answer. A problem I find is a lack of understanding of "relative wind" Is there no hope? I have witnessed a low altitude spin to impact. It was not nice. Another spin to impact gave me the opportunity to ask the pilot the question..."What makes the glider turn? His answer:"The rudder" He was a military acadamy pilot. We absolutly must teach and demonstrate more angle of attack recognition and recovery. It doesant take long before you hear or read about a stall spin fatality, Don't let your stundent go out into the wold without being trained in ALL aspects of AoA and stall spin recovery.Maybe the instructor should learn first. God bless good instructors,Fearless Fred |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|