![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 19, 10:53 am, BB wrote:
Would the cylinder still work the same way if you pierce the edge at 400agl at 120 knots at 1 mile then 15-60 seconds later pull up to 500agl will the scoring program award you which ever is the more advantageous score? [earlier vs higher?] Like Hank said, you get the most advantageous score. Rules aside though, I would hope any CD who saw this maneuver either in person or on a trace would slap the pilot with a huge unsafe flying penalty. Lots of gliders are finishing, and you can't see the guy behind and above you who you just pulled up into -- and he can't see you either. This isn't just theory. I have had a glider dive over the top of me right at the finish cylinder, missing by 20 feet -- good thing I didn't do any pulling up, or I wouldn't be here writing right now. Please just cross the cylinder wall at your final glide speed, then gently slow down and enter the pattern. The manever you describe also wastes points -- the pilot would have done better by simply gliding at 90 knots to the cylinder wall. John Cochrane. Interesting. Since the bloody cylinder finish is all about safety, why not only allow the first point of entry to count for score, and remove the incentive to pull up inside the cylinder if finishing slightly low? Obviously, if you have the energy to get back up above 500 ft after entering the cylinder, you had the energy to finish above 500ft in the first place. Unless the finish is on a ridge, of course.... On second thought, it still encourages pulling up to cross at 501 ft, instead of 499, and losing a few points...so the safety advantage is somewhat illusory. Better to enforce penalizing dangerous flying in the cylinder/during the finish/in the pattern. Seriously, if the low finish penalty is 2pts for every 10 ft, how will Winscore handle a 2 or 3 foot low finish? Is it all or nothing? O pts for 2 ft low, 1 point for 3 feet low, 2 points for 1 ft low? Just curious... Better to hash this out amicably when the field is covered with snow than on the grid during the first contest of the season! Happy Holiday, all 66 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
US SSA/SRA Contest Rules Poll | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 18 | November 4th 07 05:59 PM |
2005 SSA Rules Committee Meeting Minutes Posted | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 1 | December 20th 05 05:38 PM |
2005 SSA Contest Rules Poll and Election | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | September 27th 05 01:47 PM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |