![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Dec, 14:42, "kirk.stant" wrote:
Ian, we appear to be comparing apples and oranges - you are talking about not stalling on final, while I am talking about being able to accurately thermal, and incidentally have a better instrument for flying accurate approaches. I wonder how much "flying at Clmax" matters in good thermalling compared with "being in the right bit of the thermal"? Obviously, my opinion is colored by having actually flown airplanes with excellent AOA systems, and by my wish to optimise my soaring for XC and racing. I really think that within a few years someone will come up with a simple, low drag, accurate AOA system that will be adopted by the same group of pilots who eagerly adopted radios, TE, audio varios, glide computers, GPS, PDA moving maps, transponders, ELTs, traffic detection devices - all those "unecessary" gadgets that clutter up our cockpits but, in my opinion, make soaring safer, more efficient, and more fun. If it does these things I'll be all for it. If it costs less than twenty quid I may even buy one. As a matter of interest, how do you define "efficient" here? Ian |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|