![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kirk,
Could you summarize for me _how_ you used the AOA indicator in those aircraft, which aircraft and under what conditions ? I am curious to the actual use(s). Thanks Todd Smith 3S Sure. I used AOA in T-38s (a little - not much flight time in those) and in F-4s (about 2000 hours in those). In my current job, I fly a variety of F-15 simulators (the real thing, not PC games) and use AOA all the time. Have also a few flight in F-16s and a lot of time in F-16 simulators, which use AOA in the approach and landing configuration. In a nutshell, AOA is used anytime optimum performance is required from the wing - be it turning, flying an approach, flying for max range, recovering from a dive, etc. Since fighters can vary weight a lot due to fuel burn and store (weapons) configuration, it's impractical to try to use airspeed other than as a general guide to your energy state - your airspeed tells you how much instantaneous energy you have to maneuver, then you fly at the AOA that matches the type of turn you want - less AOA is conserves energy, more AOA turns faster, etc. If you are flying for max range or max endurance, again there is a recommended AOA to fly at - it will stay the same while the actual airspeed changes based on gross weight, configuration, and altitude. Finally, in the pattern, you figure out the approximate airspeed and AOA based on fuel and stores remaining, then crosscheck the two - if they agree, it's easier to fly AOA on most jets (F-4 especially, F-15 less so). Now, compared to gliders, these are all extremely low aspect ratio, and that will exaggerate AOA effects. But the aerodynamic priciples are the same. Finally, someone questioned about whether it's better to thermal efficiently or in the best part of the themal. The answer, IMHO, is that you should strive to do both. Right now we have wonderful instruments to help us find the best lift. But we still use a crude instrument to fly efficiently. Well, actually, most people probably thermal more by feel and attitude than by staring at the airspeed indicator. End of war story. Cheers, Kirk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|