![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 24, 9:25*am, AK wrote:
On Dec 24, 8:46 am, wrote: On Dec 23, 11:32 pm, wrote: On Dec 22, 5:31 pm, wrote: The proposed rule changes for 2008 US competition soaring are posted at SSA.org/sailplane racing/rules & process. Input is welcome. Final rules proposals go to the SSA for publication in the board "Blue Book" in mid January. Seasons Greetings to all from the SSA Competition Rules Subcommittee UH H Nixon Chair Hank, I have a question about task changing : Will the Contest Director still be allowed to create a new task when pilots are already in the air? We shouldn't have 50 pilots *playing with their computers under the same cloud base. Ryszard Krolikowski RW . A review of the proposed changes will show no change in the rules with respect to task calling or changing in the air. Experience over the years has shown that the ability to adjust the task to changing conditions to be a useful and valuable tool when used properly. UH- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Could you please give me a couple of examples when creating a brand new task while gliders are in the air is useful? I don't think creating a brand new task while gliders are already in the air is the right thing to do from safety point of view. If a day is problematic the contest director should create a number of tasks and then call one of them if he needs to change. This would allow participants to program their computers while still on the ground. With all this talk about safety finishes why this problem has not been discussed? I think the safety comity should act proactively instead retroactively. Meaning we should not have a mid air to wake us up. Regards, AK- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The number of days where task changes have made for fairer and in some cases, safer, are too numerous to count. Examples; 2 days at the '07 15M Nationals would likely have been either no contest or highly devalued had we not had the option to change tasks as the weather developed. Days were changed at the 07 Sports Nationals due to weather not developing as expected. If there had not been for the unsportsmanlike conduct of one pilot jamming the radio, the last day would also have been changed to a more appropriate task and the results of that contest likely would have been significantly different. Prior to having this option, I recall a number of days where we flew off into bad weather or on tasks that could mot be done because the option to change did not exist. I completely agree that the best option is to be able to select from previously defined tasks. That said, this is not always possible. I do no programming of my pilot interface in the air- only minimal data entry to define a task and personally don't see this as a hazard. My choice of equipment is, in part, done to ensure this is easily and quickly done,if needed, in the air. UH |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA competition rules re team flying? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 5 | October 5th 07 11:35 PM |
US Contest Rules Proposed Changes for 2006 | Ken Sorenson | Soaring | 18 | January 12th 06 04:30 PM |
Proposed 2005 Rules On SRA Site | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 79 | January 27th 05 06:51 PM |
Competition rules summary? | Ted Wagner | Soaring | 2 | January 21st 04 08:25 PM |
New SRA Site - New 2003 Rules Minutes and 2004 Rules Summary | Ken Kochanski | Soaring | 0 | December 17th 03 03:38 AM |