![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brad wrote:
I was browsing thru one of the Yahoo glider N.G.'s today and read where the World Class design may get ressurected. That got me to thinking: What would the ideal recreational next generation sailplane sailplane look like? I imagine it won't look much different from what we are seeing now in terms of slender body shapes with sexy wingtip treatments. And with the price of carbon fiber coming down, the expanding growth of the composites industry and the rising use and availability of CNC machining, it seems that there might be a niche market for a good performing, lightweight sailplane that could be tailored for the recreational market. This subject has beaten the dead horse into dog food and baseballs by now. More Purina than home runs I'm afraid ;-) Nevertheless... ....We know what *shape* we want, that's pretty easy. What ever *It* is, it should be shaped similarly to a Discus, LS-8, ASW-24 etc. Some solid handling, 15 m span, flapless (I like flaps, but a volksglider should be flapless IMHO), retractable gear, known quantity. What would make such a beast unique, and affordable, is the way that shape gets produced. I suspect the prepreg technique used in the Sparrowhawk is in the right direction. Farm out fabric cutting to someone who could laser cut many ships worth of cloth when the price is low? Also, with all the wind farms going up around the world, the technology involved in manufacturing big composite wings should be improving rapidly. Perhaps wings with a significant portion of constant cord/profile (half span?) with a mass produced, extruded spar that is cut into a segment for each wing (diverges from the Discus-esque shape but at what performance cost?) could simplify production. Posters here have said that a significant amount of the labor that goes into the manufacture of gliders is in the sanding and polishing to get a glassy smooth surface. On behalf of all the pilots who've happily flown 30 year old gliders with crappy finishes "Who cares?". If I could get a solid performing glider with a dull white finish at 2/3 the price, that's fine with me. Perhaps some decrease in surface waviness is realized in the process, but modern gliders shrink significantly over the first few years anyway, negating some of the benefit, so why pay for sanding twice? My $ 0.02 (On sale half price tomorrow only!) Shawn P.S. Sorry that this is so disjointed, dinner's ready :-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
The Soaring Server is dead; long live the Soaring Servers | John Leibacher | Soaring | 3 | November 1st 04 10:57 PM |
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" | Bob Thompson | Soaring | 3 | September 26th 04 11:48 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Soaring Server - Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 04 04:57 PM |