![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 26, 1:31 pm, Marc Ramsey wrote:
Bill Daniels wrote: "Marc Ramsey" wrote in message Affordable glider will only come if a significant portion of the community starts rethinking what they want out of the sport (I think Tony's adventures in his Cherokee may be the wave of the future 8^). I doubt the traditional glider manufacturers would ever consider addressing such a market... Marc I love Tony's Cherokee adventures. However, the sad truth is that if the Cherokee was to be put into commercial production today, it would cost even more than the LS-4. When you take the route of a deliberately designing a low performance glider, you set a trap for yourself by building a glider few will buy. PW-5 is example "A". You're misreading what I'm saying. It makes no sense to commercially produce a Cherokee using present day technology. But, I think the soaring community has worked itself into a corner where little compromise is possible. Perhaps the PW-5 failed because it's performance just wasn't high enough, but that suggests one either needs to find a way to drastically reduce (50 to 75%) the production cost of a typical standard class glider, or convince a sizable portion of the community that there is more to soaring than glider performance. Somehow, the latter seems more practical to me. Marc Perhaps the PW-5 failed because it's performance just wasn't high enough, but that suggests one either needs to find a way to drastically reduce (50 to 75%) the production cost of a typical standard class glider, or convince a sizable portion of the community that there is more to soaring than glider performance. Somehow, the latter seems more practical to me. Well, the PW-5 did not failed. It was designed to meet the requirements and concept promoted by the FAI. That concept called for glider with L/D in low 30-ties. So, it wasn't the glider as much as the pilots who failed by demanding more performance and not understanding the concept. The "One Design" class will fail again in the future regardless of what kind of glider is used for that specific purpose. And that is sad. Jacek Pasco, WA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
The Soaring Server is dead; long live the Soaring Servers | John Leibacher | Soaring | 3 | November 1st 04 10:57 PM |
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" | Bob Thompson | Soaring | 3 | September 26th 04 11:48 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Soaring Server - Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 04 04:57 PM |