![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well Steve, you need to come to the convention and meet with Brad, me,
and some other like minded folks. I completely agree with your first post about the geezers with money, (sorry guys). BTW are you THE Steve Davis, Genesis guy from CO? MM On Dec 27, 1:56*am, Steve Davis wrote: Hi Mat, I'm in favor of a Marske or Genesis spar and frame with a PETG skin. *PETG is the clear plastic that everything comes packaged in. *I can't bend it, scratch it and can barely cut it with scissors. *The stuff is everywhere, it can be recycled, surely it can also fly? *It can snap together AND be ultrasonic welded. *Graphlite spars, PETG bulkheads, ribs and stringers and the strong shape of the Genesis. It could be done.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYDdEjloYJ0 At 00:01 27 December 2007, wrote: Why did the *1-26 do so well and is STILL doing well. For crying out loud, they still have their own contest a billion years after it was introduced! * I don't understand it but we ought to really take a hard look at it. I'm not saying that we want brand new 1-26s. *I sure don't. *Brand new Cherokee IIs either. *Tony and I have more fun per dollar in our little wood ships than most out there but we wouldn't mind a little more performance, modern materials and safety features, easier rigging... *But paying $25000 for it? *Are you kidding?! The PW-5 is a fun glider but it costs a fortune to most people and looks wrong to most of the rest. *I don't think performance is the reason it didn't 'take off' The new people we need in soaring are only going to desire 40 or 50 to 1 if we teach them that's what they need to have fun, earn badges, have great flights, keep up with their friends. Why cant we design a higher performance homebuilt quick kit that has basic components built by existing manufacturing processes then quality checked and assembled by individuals,clubs, or commercial operations? *A modular homebuilt (that satisfies the 51% rule) that handles well, gets better than 35/1, climbs like a woodstock, lands like a PW, and runs like a Discus and costs $10k as a kit *and $15k finished. Look at all the creativity and innovation that led to the Cherokee, the BG-12, the Duster, Scanlon, Tern, Javalin, Bowlus, Carbon Dragon, Woodstock, Monerai, the HPs... *Sure most of those had 'issues' some were real dogs, some were great. *But, they all showed a creativity that seems lacking today. *Imagine combining the best aspects of these classic American homebuilts and applying modern materials, engineering, and manufacturing to the result. Somebody is going to do it. *Some young genius glider kid in Aero E at university with no money thinking outside the box. This isn't rocket science. *It's evolution. *You can either be part of the new wave or a dinosaur. MM- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Colorado Soaring Pilots/SSA Governor 2007 Seminar and 2006 Soaring Awards Banquet | Frank Whiteley | Soaring | 0 | February 15th 07 04:52 PM |
The Soaring Server is dead; long live the Soaring Servers | John Leibacher | Soaring | 3 | November 1st 04 10:57 PM |
Possible future legal problems with "SOARING" | Bob Thompson | Soaring | 3 | September 26th 04 11:48 AM |
Soaring Server/Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange back online | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 21st 04 05:25 PM |
Soaring Server - Worldwide Soaring Turnpoint Exchange | John Leibacher | Soaring | 0 | June 19th 04 04:57 PM |