![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 31, 5:14*pm, wrote:
If that part of the country is so good, have another contest at Ely! Parowan is so tight, I understand one could not even fly there with a wingspan of more than 20 m? You guys just have to get your act together and *arrange contests at Ely or similar. If pilots want to race there! One should not have to tell anyone to stay home? soarski On Dec 31, 12:07*pm, Bullwinkle wrote: On 12/31/07 11:37 AM, in article , "JJ Sinclair" wrote: Parowan offers not only outstanding soaring with plentiful landing locations (for the most part), but it is also one long days travel from some 10 western states. The waiting list is gigantic............some 80+ last year! How do (did) we deal with all these folks that want to fly Parowan? Last year, everyone within region 9 was automatically in + another 5 reverse seeded pilots from outside the region. This resulted in an overloaded sports class that took up some 20 slots, leaving the other 3 classes to fight over the remaining 30 slots (50 max). Now, let's look at the sports class. We had quite a group with no experience, save a silver badge and who were they competing against? Top of the line; Striedeck, Wills, Harrison; Guys with high seeding, because that's what it took to get in! Is this what we want for our entry lavel competitor, raw recruits racing against national / international class pilots? I believe the rules committee dealt with this discrepancy in a fair way, let 0-50% from within region 9, with no questions asked, then let the individual seeding decide the rest. I was 68th on the list and got in just 2 days before it started. A couple of those already in had to drop out, one broke his bird and the other had job issues. Most couldn't drop everything, so the list quickly got to me at 68th. Those who couldn't drop everything were good pilots that really wanted to come, were they treated fairly? This problem only happens at Parowna and Mifflin and I say the Super Regionals is a good idea. Newbies, if you can't get into Parowan, come to Air Sailing for some "not so intense" entry level racing. JJ Sinclair Just because Parowan is a great place to fly and people from outside R9 want to fly there, shouldn't give everyone who wishes to fly in our Regional the right to do so. The "problem" that was solved with the new rules is this: how to make it easier for outsiders wanting to invade the R9 Regionals and prevent R9 residents from flying in our own contest. I personally think the three you mentioned, plus all the others from outside R9, should stay home. Why not just have a National contest at Parowan every year to satisfy the easterners (and New Zealanders, apparently), and quit stacking the rules against residents of Region 9? Let our Regional contest be truly a Regional contest. This is manipulation of the system pure and simple, to benefit the few and discriminate against the little guy. Sorry, that's just my opinion. I respectfully recognize that others disagree.- Hide quoted text - Well I'm a bit torn on this one. I flew my first contest in 20 years at Parowan in 2004 and have flown there in 2005 and 2007. I'm from out of Region 9. I've gotten in every time, but it's always a nail biter, which is a problem given how much I have to plan ahead to take time off. Speaking pesonally, I am thankful to to have an easier time getting in as it is an exceptional soaring venue. I don't really agree that Parowan is not a good place for new contest pilots. In the west prety much all the sites have some rough terrain and I find Parowan to be more friendly than most. I also don't necessarily agree that newbies shouldn't mix with top pilots in the sports class. If top pilots elect to fly Duos and end up in Sports, that's a fine choice an it's kind of cool fo a newbie to go toe to toe with the top guns even if they kick your butt in the end (I am a personal recipient of said butt kicking at Parowan in 2004. I had a fine time just the same and I don't think I got in any one's way). I think it's not a bad way to get new folks up the curve a bit faster - have them fly with experienced pilots sooner rather than later. I guess I find the Super Regional idea feels a bit too much like it started with a particular end in mind, like "get the following guys in at Mifflin and Parowan". I would rather see some ability to admit out of Region pilots to ALL regionals while preserving the character of Regionals as stepping stones for pilots in developing contest flying skills. I think a longer lead time for a non-refundable deposit will eliminate a few casual entrants and avoid some of the "last minute shuffle" at the bottom of the entry list - that's probably a good thing for all concerned. I also think allowing some leeway for organizers to set minimum/maximum class sizes to balance the field and reserve a specified number or percent of spots as preferential for in-Region makes sense in general for regionals, not just for specific sites. That said, I expect the contest committee elected to do it the way the did for a reason, so I'm willing to see how it goes in 2008. 9B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Freestate Regionals 2006 | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | April 10th 06 11:52 AM |
Lasham Regionals | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | July 2nd 04 06:00 PM |
Lasham Regionals July 3 - 11 | Steve Dutton | Soaring | 0 | May 27th 04 09:34 PM |
Why no 18m class at Regionals? | John | Soaring | 7 | October 17th 03 02:41 AM |
Gransden regionals traces | Martin Gregorie | Soaring | 5 | September 8th 03 05:48 PM |